A Sunday Soliloquy- Liberals Worship Words, Not Deeds

 Last week, I read a Mia Farrow tweet which immediately preceded a lightning bolt to my head and an "aha!" moment.

Farrow was bitching about President Trump and the language he uses. According to her, it was so abrasive that she would not allow her children to be in the same room as a TV broadcast featuring Trump.

Not one to simply separate words from a speaker, she went on an anti-Trump rant. That's when I had the "aha!" moment.

She wasn't bitching about low inflation, low gas prices, or a secure border- she was bitching about the language Trump uses.

This is what the democratic party has become. A mob of pussies hell bent on trying to make us use their silly ass pro nouns and words while they topple over our history.

I started applying my newly discovered Mia Farrow "aha" moment to everyone in my life. It was true. Liberals absolutely hate direct speech that they find offensive- because it does not agree with them.  

Conversely, they loved Obama with his cutesy little jokes. They were willing to forgive the fact that Obama refused to prosecute the thousands of fraud committing bankers who donated to his campaign. They were willing to forget the scandals. The deaths of Brian Terry and Christopher Stevens and 3 others- could not possibly be his fault.  

Because you see, Obama uses nice language. All of that collateral damage, well they reason, it was not his fault. He tells cutesy little jokes and reads carefully scripted speeches. 

Obama was in the same vein as Bill Clinton. Clinton did not sell us out to NAFTA or remove the banking laws that have protected us since the Great Depression. He said nice things and chuckled. So he messed around with an intern- we all know that happens. It was ok to get on national TV and lie to everyone- just be sure and do it nicely.

That's why they hate Trump. He uses direct, candid speech. No cute jokes or little smiles. He attacks anyone who attacks him. He gets personal. He calls people names. He tweets mean things. Same with Bush. He said some stupid things. Liberals lashed out at both of those Presidents.

Was it true in my personal life? Did I have the same experiences speaking with liberals? 

Absolutely. In fact, I could find very few exceptions. Liberals do not like to be challenged. They believe they possess the intellectual high ground. They see no merit in anyone that refuses to back down. You are supposed to inhale their words and opinion. Your words, if anything, cause them great angst.

That's why President Trump is hated by the left. It doesn't have fuck all to do with deeds or bringing jobs home or low inflation. They hate his speech. 

Of course, the conservative side loves Trump. We love watching a non career, no lawyer politician who gives us low gas prices, a secure border, a great economy. We love watching him give the middle finger to liberals, the media, and the swamp. We love watching him get his ass kicked, time and time again, and he just gets back up and fights some more.

We want deeds, not words. 











Comments

MMinWA said…
"he's one of them" If DJT was deep state, why in the fuckity fuck fuck have been they hounding him to death? From the collusion BS right up to the current DOJ "document" travesty, this is how they treat their coconspiritors? Further, if the President was truly on their side, he's got the goods & can name names. Get a grip dude, it's a short pier you're walking out on.

I tried for years to go back & forth with my Chicago REgressive sister. She would respond with only I don't want to get polemical. Every bad thing I warned that was coming down the road for Chicago was coming true. And this was in the early 90s. That's when I saw that blacks were crossing I-55 and bringing their celebrations north without the proper blowback.

Now? Good fucking grief, people watering their lawns are assaulted or shot in broad daylight by roving gangs of blacks driving randomly through neighborhoods. And if you defend yourself? yeah, stupid question.

There's a couple guys at one of my side hustles, very REgressive, totally pro vax. There's no info or data I can cite that will move them off the safe & effective BS. I tell them even the CDC has admitted the vax neither stopped transmission or prevented infection! No use. Crazy huh?

It's pointless even bothering, the lines are drawn and aren't going to move. I read a story about Che years ago. He had a wall in his second story office that faced the firing squad posts where people were led and tied to before being shot. He had a large hole put in his wall so he could watch. He said he enjoyed the people that thought a mistake was being made & they pleaded for their lives right up until the rifles were raised.

I aways question their information sources. Personally on occasion I read The NYT and WaPo, watch some CNN or MSNBC and visit sites like CommonDreams. I'm banned from commenting at most. Legacy media is poison but it's still a choice.





I’ve often thought for a long time now that the wrong actors get the Oscars, when it should be given out liberally to the professional political con artists of our era.. Trump included..

What good is a puppet even when says what you want to hear?

The hatred of a fellow artists in art is always somewhat comical.. Unless you’re gullible enough to believe its real.. When its not..

The theatre of politics is very convincing for those who wish to remain naive and deluded..

Governments are instituted by ‘constitutions’ together with their countries, or kingdoms, and they are in-fact all corporations, and they are as corporate-possessions held in the hands of their owner, which is a‘foreign interests’ clearly named in the Paris Peace Agreement of 1783.

Definition of plenipotentiary
plenipotentiaries (noun, plural)
1. a person, especially a diplomatic agent, invested with full power or authority to transact business on behalf of another.
Adjective
2. invested with full power or authority, as a diplomatic agent.
3. conferring or bestowing full power, as a commission.
4. absolute or full, as power.

It becomes obvious that a ‘diplomatic plenipotentiary’ represents and acts on behalf of a foreign interest, which interest, of course, President Trump was as President and as a possible president elect again is obligated to represent.

Those foreign interests, of which President Trump is a representative diplomatic agent to them, insist that their corporate interests reflect their ambitions..

Pretend opposition would say things some people want to hear while doing otherwise.. And Trump did that.. Pretend opposition is a cleverly designed political ruse for leading the controlled opposition. Lenin said something about that..

It maybe helpful to decipher terms that will help to characterize holders of offices of state, in their historic true light, in relation to their allegiances in the performance of their duties based upon international laws and the treaties they must comply with.. And stop listening to the BS news.. And alternative medias open ions and perspectives that are at best, nonsense.

Popular posts from this blog

The "Keeping Time" Has Arrived- The Sunday Collage

The Killing of Craig Robertson- The Sunday Collage

The United States- The World's Biggest Banana Republic