The Unvaccinated Should Be Denied Hospital Care and Left To Die
I thought that headline might grab you. I found it today on a commenter's profile. He was in his 30's, vaccinated, and living in the midwest.
I read most of his vitriolic comments. Many were directed at "anti vaxxers" and a few other comments displayed his hatred for Trump supporters. Often, his comments were personal attacks directed at people who he deemed worthy of shaming.
It is true that most of the people with covid who are in intensive care units throughout the country and on ventilators- are unvaccinated. Anywhere from 10 to 20% of patients on ventilators are vaccinated. The unvaccinated are far more likely to be on a ventilator and far more likely to die.
So it wasn't like there wasn't some grain of truth in what he had to say. It was just a horrible fucking thing to say. It was completely devoid of empathy, compassion, and was a blue ribbon example of American incivility. So this guy, Mr Responsible Vaccine Taker has decided that the health care system should bounce all those idiot anti vaxxers out on their asses and let them die. After all, it was their choice.
I had seen this fear driven rhetoric before. I remember hearing the exact same shit when the public in America discovered that AIDS was chiefly in the gay community and killing homosexuals. The heterosexual community breathed a collective sigh of relief while directing all their hatred towards irresponsible AIDS patients draining hospitals of their resources while causing health insurance premiums to rise. Then AIDS began to creep into the heterosexual realm. When that happened and people from all walks of life began to get ill and die, the condom revolution began in earnest.
Mr. Responsible Vaccine Taker was probably conceived around the mid 80's and doesn't remember all the hysteria that HIV/AIDS wreaked on our society. Instead of vaccines back then, it was condoms. People who didn't use condoms were just like today's anti-vaxxers. Hatred was directed at casual, unprotected sex and those that engaged in it.
In a bizarre twist of fate, Mr Responsible Vaccine Taker dwells amongst us as the result of unprotected sex. His arrival here and his subsequent observations might have been completely derailed if his parents had followed the strict rules of protected sex back then. Had his parents acquired AIDS during that encounter, perhaps we could have found someone to declare that his parents should be denied hospital care and left to die for their cavalier attitudes and stupid decision making. Hell, they might have even been Reagan supporters.
Here's the deal. People are needlessly suffering and dying. I didn't invent covid and I certainly didn't go looking for a case of it. I didn't want to inject an experimental drug into my body at the behest of a dementia patient. I certainly didn't think I'd wind up on a ventilator fighting for my life. I played a game of percentages and I barely survived. I have seen others, not as lucky as I was, die.
But I never wished anyone into their grave. Our world culture has been dealing with various plagues, flus, smallpox, AIDS, SARS, and other epidemics for centuries. Disease is not new.
Maybe it's time for a little human decency, a little compassion, and perhaps a self evaluation Mr Responsible Vaccine Taker. One day you will die, perhaps because of a simple decision you will make.
Let's pray the people helping you don't subscribe to your way of thinking.
Mr. Responsible Vaccine Taker was killed today by an armed gunman as he exited his car at Walmart. This occurred after a string of robberies in the area. Mr Responsible Vaccine Taker was denied medical care and left in the parking lot because medical personnel arriving at the scene determined that had he simply stayed home, none of this would have happened. Therefore, it was Mr Responsible Vaccine Taker's own fault and responding personnel decided it was not worth the cost to try and save him.
Thankfully, we don't live in that world. Not yet anyway.
Comments
The V screws up the V'd folks immune system...
Now they say Pan-coronavirus "super" vaccine needed…THE MORE WE LISTEN TO AND READ THESE PEOPLE the more we see that the vaccine hesitant and anti vaccine folks, well aren't so stupid as the early bird vaccinated like to argue…Well then, those vaccines up to this point have been proven worthless… Of course those vaccines have another purpose..
"While our current vaccines continue to work swimmingly well against severe disease or death, it’s become increasingly clear that the current vaccines have limitations. The neutralizing antibody response (i.e. first line of defense) mounted by mRNA vaccines wanes after a few months, and we’ve seen a decline in vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic infections to go along with that. As a result, Israel is rolling out a 4th vaccine for those aged 60+ years. It’s also clear that this virus will continue to evolve with mutations that are hard to predict. While Moderna and Pfizer have announced their plan to make Omicron-specific vaccines, we will ultimately need to transcend a Greek letter approach with a vaccine that would be effective for the entire coronavirus family, essentially making it variant-proof. An ideal solution is a universal coronavirus vaccine that would not only protect against SARS-CoV-2 but also against other coronaviruses that might cause future animal outbreaks and pandemics. Scientists have been advocating for this type of coronavirus vaccine since as early as May 2020 and as recently as the beginning of this month.We’ve been working for years on a pan-vaccine for other viruses, like HIV-1, influenza, malaria, Epstein-Barr (NCT03186781; NCT03814720; NCT04579250; NCT04645147; NCT04296279), but no vaccine has successfully made it through clinical trials thus far. The difference for SARS-CoV-2 is that it mutates far less than HIV or influenza, making it more ideally suited for such an approach. If any universal vaccine makes it through the rigorous clinical trial process, it will be a big leap in medicine and science. "---Dr. Katelyn Jetelina - MPH and PhD in Epidemiology and Biostatistics. WORKS FOR MODERNA…
Bring on the Donkey...
It's not viral... It's nano.. And it's frequency activated..
For a while it was our demanding election honesty. They stopped counting ballots in the middle of the night with Trump holding insurmountable leads in 7 swing states. That has NEVER been done in our history. Despite video evidence and a 1,000 sworn affidavits, NOTHING was done. A forensic audit was done in ONE COUNTY in AZ and it showed over 50,000 illegal votes. That's over 5x the amount that Trump lost that state by. Ignored by the media. Memory holed. And the sane among labeled as insurrectionists.
Before that for 5 years, it was our support for the Nazi Trump.
Before that for 8 years it was our obvious racism.
We're living in that world Brian. We will always be vilified. It will never be resolved without a river of blood & the total elimination of one side. Those that are advocating some kind of separation don't understand the true nature of communism.
I'm reading now about the attempted communist take over of Malaya in the late 40s. Wanton murder and destruction on a country that was at peace and prosperous. Fat and happy but communism was spreading throughout E Asia and they manufactured grievances. Sound familiar?
Remember the informant that related Bill Ayers telling his fellow commies that they had better be prepared to murder at least 25 Million Americans that they would be unable to convert? Back then it was just a handful of revolutionaries but Bill et.al. got wise. He burrowed into the institutions, undermined the traditions & culture, destroyed our education system, consolidated the media and infiltrated the government.
Now they have the levers of power and propaganda in their hands. For people like Mr Responsible Vaccine Taker, we're bugs to be eradicated. Here's another to remember, the Bundy standoff. I visit lefty sites and the comments were sickening with calls to Waco them. And the feds have quietly prosecuted most of the men who answered the call for help.
They almost federalized our elections and might yet. But they won't have to resort to voter fraud for long as the millions of illegals that are here as well as the millions pouring are changing our demography.
I don't know what the spark is going to be but it's going to happen.
Hospitals? What hospitals? Hospitals will be overwhelmed with clueless, gullible suckers who so proudly lined up for suicide jabs. Regular people will die at the usual rate long after Fauci's Gene Pool Bleach has done its job.
In fact, the deceased believed- that when he took a flu vaccine with a covid booster- he soon developed sepsis.
Once again, this is an adverse event probably not reported under VAERS.
I guess my point is that the media keeps whipping up this propaganda all aimed at forcing the unvaccinated to get vaccinated and suppressing any talk of non vaccine treatments.
The misplaced hatred continues.
Brian
Cue this up at the 36:00 mark-it's pretty horrible
https://www.brighteon.com/cf7bd650-bc2c-481f-a7f0-f5740fdceedc
"Nothing is more surprising to those, who consider human affairs with a philosophical eye, than to see the easiness with which the many are governed by the few; and to observe the implicite submission with which men resign their own sentiments and passions to those of their rulers. When we enquire by what means this wonder is brought about, we shall find, that as Force is always on the side of the governed, the governors have nothing to support them but opinion. ‘Tis therefore, on opinion only that government is founded; and this maxim extends to the most despotic and most military governments, as well as to the most free and most popular. — David Hume, “Of the First Principles of Government,” Essays and Treatises on Several Subjects, 1758 edition
We may perhaps question today whether force is always on the side of the governed or even whether it always has been, but by and large Hume’s observation commands assent. Put it another way, all government rests on the consent, however obtained, of the governed. And over the long run mere force, even if entirely at the disposal of the governing few, is not a sufficient basis for inducing consent. Human beings, if only to maintain a semblance of self-respect, have to be persuaded. Their consent must be sustained by opinions.
The few who govern take care to nourish those opinions. No easy task, for the opinions needed to make the many submit to the few are often at variance with observable fact. The success of government thus requires the acceptance of fictions, requires the willing suspension of disbelief, requires us to believe that the emperor is clothed even though we can see that he is not. And, to reorder Hume’s dictum, the maxim extends to the most free and most popular governments as well as to the most despotic and most military. The popular governments of Britain and the United States rest on fictions as much as the governments of Russia and China.
Continued;
Government requires make-believe. Make believe that the king is divine, make believe that he can do no wrong or make believe that the voice of the people is the voice of God. Make believe that the people have a voice or make believe that the representatives of the people are the people. Make believe that governors are the servants of the people. Make believe that all men are equal or make believe that they are not.
The political world of make-believe mingles with the real world in strange ways, for the make-believe world may often mold the real one. In order to be viable, in order to serve its purpose, whatever that purpose may be, a fiction must bear some resemblance to fact. If it strays too far from fact, the willing suspension of disbelief collapses. And conversely it may collapse if facts stray too far from the fiction that we want them to resemble. Because fictions are necessary, because we cannot live without them, we often take pains to prevent their collapse by moving the facts to fit the fiction, by making our world conform more closely to what we want it to be. We sometimes call it, quite appropriately, reform or reformation, when the fiction takes command and reshapes reality.
Although fictions enable the few to govern the many, it is not only the many who are constrained by them. In the strange commingling of political make-believe and reality the governing few no less than the governed many may find themselves limited—we may even say reformed—by the fictions on which their authority depends. Not only authority but liberty too may depend on fictions. Indeed liberty may depend, however deviously, on the very fictions that support authority. That, at least, has been the case in the Anglo-American world; and modern liberty, for better or for worse, was born, or perhaps we should say invented, in that world and continues to be nourished there.
Because it is a little uncomfortable to acknowledge that we rely so heavily on fictions, we generally call them by some more exalted name. We may proclaim them as self-evident truths, and that designation not inappropriate, for it implies our commitment to them and at the same time protects them from challenge. Among the fictions we accept today as self-evident are those that Thomas Jefferson enshrined in the Declaration of Independence, that all men are created equal and that they owe obedience to government only if it is their own agent, deriving its authority from their consent. It would be difficult, if not impossible, to demonstrate these propositions by factual evidence. It might be somewhat easier, by the kind of evidence we usually require for the proof of any debatable proposition, to demonstrate that men are not created equal and that they have not delegated authority to any government. But self-evident propositions are not debatable, and to challenge these would rend the fabric of our society.
It is not the purpose of this book to challenge them, and my use of the word fiction has no such intention. I have been troubled by the pejorative connotations attached to the word, but I have been unable to find a better one to describe the different phenomena to which I have applied it. I can only hope that readers who persevere to the end of the book will recognize that the fictional qualities of popular sovereignty sustain rather than threaten the human values associated with it. I hope they will also recognize that I do not imply deception or delusion on the part of those who employed or subscribed to the fictions examined here, fictions in which they willingly suspended disbelief. My purpose is not to debunk, but to explore the wonder that Hume points to, the fact that most of us submit willingly to be governed by a few of us. The opinions to which Hume attributes this wonder are doubtless of many kinds, but I am concerned with those that seem to defy demonstration. I prefer to call them fictions rather than self-evident truths, because what we accept as self-evident today did not seem so three or four centuries ago.
At the time when England’s American colonies were founded, the fictions that sustained government—and liberty—were almost the reverse of those we accept today. Englishmen of the sixteenth and early seventeenth century affirmed that men were created unequal and that they owed obedience to the government because the Creator had endowed their king with his own sacred authority. These propositions too were fictional, requiring suspension of disbelief, defying demonstration as much as those that took their place. How then did one give way to the other? How did the divine right of kings give way to the sovereignty of the people? And how did the new fictions both sustain government by the few and restrain the few for the benefit of the many? In other words, how did the exercise and the authentication of power in the Anglo-American world as we know it come into being? These are the questions for which I have sought answers.
The search begins with the old fiction, the divine right of kings. Since we have long since given up suspending our disbelief in this one, we should have no difficulty in perceiving its fictional qualities. It enjoyed, nevertheless, a longer duration than the sovereignty of the people has yet attained. In examining its operation in the years just before its collapse, we may gain some initial insights into the way political fictions can both sustain and limit the authority of the government."