Probably.
In the days following the Benghazi fiasco, I stumbled onto a story similar to the one that I am going to link here.
It makes sense that the CIA would be setting up camp in Libya and using a consulate as our "cover story." Telling the truth might go a long way in clearing up all of the confusion that we've had about who was in charge of what. Was Hillary (the state department) in charge or was the CIA?
Maybe that's why nothing happened.
I only have one question. If this story is true, why would a 7 member CIA strike force evacuate without Stevens and his aide? (and just how was it that a couple of ex-Navy Seals just happened by?)
http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2012-10-10/opinions/35501217_1_benghazi-darrell-issa-security-lapses
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
Earlier this week, graphs started popping up on X and other places. Most of those graphs showed the steep and dramatic increase in popular ...
-
Several years ago, as Ann Coulter (2016) was being laughed at for predicting the Trump presidential win, I was reading a piece about why wo...
-
There is a giant swath of folks in this country who simply cannot believe what is happening. They cannot believe that a "convicted felo...
1 comment:
It sure puts different angles into play doesn't it?? I'm still not sure though that Hillary did not know about what was going on, nor for that matter the turd in the whitehouse. THEY ALL knew.
Post a Comment