tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3247350212550914879.post5157766008742982289..comments2024-03-04T15:59:34.907-07:00Comments on Frankenstein Government: Taking the Context Out of History- The Sunday CollageBrianhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11009623520148094685noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3247350212550914879.post-45775856981772445552017-08-24T05:46:11.530-06:002017-08-24T05:46:11.530-06:00Remember you don't appreciate lawyers? Or rath...Remember you don't appreciate lawyers? Or rather Attorney's... <br /><br />Somebodies posterity somewhere in this crowd did have complete freedom to do whatever they deemed necessary and proper to preserve their complete freedoms… And they're still doing it while we all look on…<br /><br />So sovereigns get to make all of these historical "blunders" and citizens get to watch and complain… My opinion is the same old nation/state entity is controlling all of these nation/states and their inquisition has evolved to the the point of being unrecognizable by the majority of people in these various societies within these various nation/states - estates - plantations - that are members of the United Nations - Family of Nations all implementing similar forms of the Law of Nations based upon International Law.. There is even an international intellectual property data base where the owners of said legalisms are clearly listed.. Who owns the LAW owns it all.. I've been pointing this out for several years now.. You're still in the skeptical category.. You're a complainer.. AND there is a section in the Law of Nations that refers to citizen complainers.. Suggesting how sovereigns handle complainers.. when the Framers referenced Law Of Nations Law book, by mere reference to it they incorporated the entire Law of Nations into their Constitution… <br /><br /><br />Article I Section 8 - Powers of Congress~ To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations;<br /><br /><br />This includes "human resources"… Resources be property, is a consumable article… When they labeled us property we should have woke the fk up… <br /><br />"Governments have universally exercised a despotic control of consumptions, sometimes from humane, but chiefly from fraudulent motives. Laws for limiting the prices of consumable articles, unattended by the desire of transferring property are of the former description; and laws for controlling consumptions, with the covert intention of transferring property, of the latter. But whether the motive by which such laws have been dictated has been good or bad, their effects have been uniformly tyrannical or pernicious. They have even sometimes created the famines they intended to prevent. The whole code of these laws is a commentary upon the policy of subjecting consumptions to the absolute control of governments, however constituted. When these laws designed to provide the multitude with bread, they starve them; when they pretend to supply the multitude with money, they impoverish them." ~John Taylor: Tyranny Unmasked<br /> <br />I'm not a human… <br /><br />Article I Section 8 - Powers of Congress<br />~ To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.<br />What is "necessary and proper"? Anything they want it to mean. There is no such thing as an unconstitutional law because if it got passed it had to be "necessary and proper".<br /><br />Oops.. <br /><br />Clever aye? Compleat Patriothttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10838632975517068225noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3247350212550914879.post-77671582981063158482017-08-24T05:11:57.773-06:002017-08-24T05:11:57.773-06:00
Notice who determines who lives in a society and ...<br />Notice who determines who lives in a society and who is removed from said society via various methods of removal as described in your words above..<br /><br />It should be clear who a Nation/State belongs to and who it does not belong to…<br />[Sylvester, supra note 55, at 67; see also Stewart Jay, The Status of the Law of Nations in Early American Law, 42 VAND. L. REV. 819, 823 (1989) (“In ascertaining principles of the law of nations, lawyers and judges of that era relied heavily on continental treatise writers, Vattel being the most often consulted by Americans. An essential part of a sound legal education consisted of reading Vattel, Grotius, Pufendorf, and Burlamaqui, among others.”).]<br />Below is what Vattel and the Law of Nations has to say…<br />“The law of nations is the law of sovereigns. It is principally for them, and for their ministers, that it ought to be written. All mankind are indeed interested in it; and, in a free country, the study of its maxims is a proper employment for every citizen; but it would be of little consequence to impart the knowledge of it only to private individuals, who are not called to the councils of nations, and who have no influence in directing the public measures. If the conductors of slates, if all those who are employed in public affairs, condescended to apply seriously to the study of a science which ought to be their law, and, as it were, the compass by which to steer their course, what happy effects might we not expect from a good treatise on the law of nations! We every day feel the advantages of a good body of laws in civil society: — the law of nations is, in point of importance, as much superior to the civil law, as the proceedings of nations and sovereigns are more momentous in their consequences than those of private persons….”<br />“…But fatal experience too plainly proves how little regard those who are at the head of affairs pay to the dictates of justice, in conjunctures where they hope to find their advantage. Satisfied with bestowing their attention on a system of politics which is often false, since often unjust, the generality of them think they have done enough when they have thoroughly studied that. Nevertheless, we may truly apply to states a maxim which has long been acknowledged as true with respect to individuals, — that the best and safest policy is that which is founded on virtue. Cicero, as a great master in the art of government as in eloquence and philosophy, does not content himself with rejecting the vulgar maxim, that “a state cannot be happily governed without committing injustice;” he even proceeds so far as to lay down the very reverse of the proposition as an invariable truth, and maintains, that “without a strict attention to the most rigid justice, public affairs cannot be advantageously administered.”<br />Providence occasionally bestows on the world kings and ministers whose minds are impressed with this great truth. Let us not renounce the pleasing hope that the number of those wise conductors of nations will one day be multiplied; and in the interim let us, each in his own sphere, exert our best efforts to accelerate the happy period.”~[Emmerich de Vattel, The Law of Nations]<br />From: The Law of Nations; Preliminaries: (This is what “States should be attaining” and this will give you a clue about what “all individuals in a State” should be striving for.)Compleat Patriothttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10838632975517068225noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3247350212550914879.post-3056719247429601312017-08-24T04:40:45.665-06:002017-08-24T04:40:45.665-06:00In other words I prefer to live and control my own...In other words I prefer to live and control my own anarchy rather than be forced to live their predetermined anarchy designed to manage me... Compleat Patriothttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10838632975517068225noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3247350212550914879.post-73647544904688849402017-08-24T04:39:07.556-06:002017-08-24T04:39:07.556-06:00Obviously this has been a republic in form but a m...Obviously this has been a republic in form but a monarchy in power… For a very long time, longer than most folks care to consider… Unfortunately.. All men are equal under the law.. The question is who's law? Obviously not man's made up legalism… Because all through man's history of man making his own laws their has been no equality.. NONE.. Equality for all men exists but almost all men have turned their backs upon it.. Equality for all men under that law makes all men equal.. Thats where the equality is.. Apparently we don't have the capacity to act accordingly.. Love His Love Language and love your brothers.. So much for The Republic of Plato aye Brian? Perhaps they should have poured a cup of poison down his neck…<br /><br />“Let me draw a parallel. The Republic of Plato is the founding document of Western political theory. It is of overwhelming importance and contains a hundred fundamental insights and foundational thoughts. But it is a directly totalitarian text. It endorses an intensely hierarchical or caste society. It says that philosophers should rule, and with absolute power. One of the recurring themes is that the rulers will have to lie to the people continuously in order to control them, and it says they ought to. It proposes that the rulers match people up for mating in a gigantic eugenics program designed to entrench the class structure more in each generation: mate shoemakers with shoemakers, male soldiers with female soldiers, philosopher kings with philosopher queens. It says unauthorized infants should be killed. And so on. Aristotle was the first to systematically attack the Republic on such grounds, and in a democratic era, we must find the basic ideas repugnant.”~~Sartwell<br /><br />I have come to these very conclusions myself after reading The Republic.<br />As far as real democracy is concerned, and not the false paradigm of Bernaysian Democracy – the only path to this principle is statelessness, that is anarchy.<br />Finally a society of grown up men no longer sucking on a wolf's teet, with no need for a Parental State.Compleat Patriothttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10838632975517068225noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3247350212550914879.post-85150278153539230322017-08-20T11:59:26.151-06:002017-08-20T11:59:26.151-06:00If I could be so pompous and arrogant as to add, j...If I could be so pompous and arrogant as to add, just as the soldiers who rounded up Indians and the police who rounded up Japanese thought they were doing the right thing, so must have the Germans who rounded up Jews, Gypsies, homosexuals, and any deemed 'other' to the Aryan cause. This could not have happened without a concerted, consistent, and persistent campaign -- administered by? <br /><br />The media. <br /><br />As always, excellent piece.<br />Shoban Illiterati<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com